A stepped up schedule of “site reviews”
has been suggested as an attempt
to settle major differences of opinion
between Columbia Basin fish and
wildlife managers and the group
of scientists charged with reviewing
Columbia Basin project funding proposals
for fiscal year 2000.
But it is uncertain whether such
reviews could be completed in time to
answer questions the 11-member Independent
Scientific Review Panel has
about the artificial production
practice known as …

Read the Full Article

Login to your account or Become a Member

More news from CBB: