13 of the 16 for funding while CBFWA favored only two of the 16.

ISRP also pointed out that it and CBFWA appeared to differ greatly in
their methods for rating new vs. ongoing projects. The panel notes
it recommends, based on scientific soundness and programmatic value,
1/4 times the number of new proposals for funding than did CBFWA. Of
new proposals recommended by the ISRP for funding, 36 were placed by
CBFWA in its Tier 2 (fund if money is available) or Tier 3 (do not
categories. Of 49 new proposals CBFWA recommended for …

Read the Full Article

Login to your account or Become a Member

More news from CBB: