Latest CBB News | Archives | About Us | Free Newsletter


FOLLOW THE CBB ON TWITTER




SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE WEEKLY E-MAIL NEWSLETTER 



  


Latest CBB News
Cross-Border Coalition Urges Collaboration In Modernizing U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty
Posted on Friday, February 12, 2016 (PST)

A cross-border coalition from a broad group of 51 organization and associations are urging the U.S. and Canadian governments to modernize the 52-year old U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty in order to protect the environmental values of the river.  

 

The groups sent a letter this week to policymakers from the United States and the Canadian province of British Columbia urging them to develop and share critical information as an essential step in protecting and restoring the Columbia River and its watershed as they negotiate the treaty.

 

“As citizen-based coalitions in Canada and the United States, we are writing on behalf of organizations in both countries that collectively represent millions of people,” the letter says.

 

The letter was signed by Martin Carver of Nelson, British Columbia, Principal, Aqua Environmental Assoc. and by Joseph Bogaard, Executive Director of Save Our Wild Salmon Coalition in the U.S.

 

“We support modernizing the 1964 U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty, to improve the health of basin ecosystems and ensure that the river and its people are more resilient to the increasing effects of climate change,” the letter continues.

 

Other signers include leaders from conservation, commercial and recreational fishing, and faith communities. The letter is addressed to Canada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Stephane Dion; United States Secretary of State John Kerry; and British Columbia’s Premier Christy Clark.

 

A copy of the letter can be downloaded here:

http://www.wildsalmon.org/images/stories/PDFs/Fact_Sheets/CRT.US.CA.Ltr.final.us.pdf

 

“Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty to meet the challenges of the 21st Century must focus on protecting and restoring the health of this important river and its watershed,” Carver said.

 

According to the coalition’s news release, Carver is among the non-governmental leaders in Canada working with those in the United States to broaden the Treaty’s current scope to include a new purpose that prioritizes the protection and restoration of the Columbia River.

 

The scope of the original Treaty of 1964 was limited to just two purposes, the coalition says – coordinated power production and flood management – and that the upcoming negotiations between the U.S. and Canada provide an opportunity to elevate the ecological needs of the river and address the mounting impacts of climate change.

 

“The organizations signing this letter represent millions of people who understand that the health of the Columbia River and the interests of communities in both nations will be best served by Treaty negotiations based on collaboration rather than competition,” Bogaard said. “Though the Columbia River might span two countries, it is one river within its own watershed. Our two nations need to work together to manage and protect it as a single system.”

 

The letter offers two recommendations:

 

1. adding “ecosystem-based function” as a third Treaty purpose

2. developing a “common U.S.-Canada analytic base to explore and assess operational scenarios and watershed futures across the whole Columbia basin.”

 

Restoring ecosystem-based functions could include such measures as  restoration of wetlands, riparian areas and floodplains; approximation of natural hydrographs; reduced impacts of reservoir and dam operations on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems; fish passage and reintroduction of anadromous species; and adaptive management to continuously improve ecosystem functions, the letter says.

 

The common analytic base would “provide a framework for understanding the potential for improvement of ecosystem function, and also to adequately assess tradeoffs and synergies between all water uses in the basin (ecosystems, power production, flood control, irrigation, domestic, navigation, etc.).”

 

The 1,242 mile-long (2,000 km) Columbia River originates in the Canadian province of British Columbia before flowing south into Washington State. It forms the border between Washington and Oregon before it flows into the ocean between the two states. It has been heavily dammed primarily for power, water storage and flood management.

 

“The health of the Columbia River’s ecosystem was compromised from over-development in the last century and now climate change in this one,” said Greg Haller, conservation director for Pacific Rivers in Portland. “A modernized Treaty must protect and restore the health of the river, its fish and wildlife and help ensure that its communities are more resilient to the intensifying effects of climate change.”

 

“The Canadian portion of the river was heavily impacted by the construction of dams pursuant to the 1964 Treaty” said Bob Peart, executive director of the Sierra Club of BC.  “Treaty modernization offers the best chance for restoring some of the ecological values and environmental services that were lost when the dams were built and that continue to be impacted on a daily basis. The health of the river will benefit if both nations work together towards mutual environmental goals.”

 

The Treaty was first established by the United States and Canada in 1964 to coordinate power production and flood management on the Columbia River. Important provisions of the Treaty are set to expire in 2024 and a window to update or modernize the Treaty opened in September 2014, according to the coalition.

 

As it approaches the Treaty negotiations with British Columbia, the U.S. State Department in June 2015 said it would include ecosystem-based functions, along with power production and flood control, in the talks.

 

Also see:

 

-- CBB, June 12, 2015, “State Department: Columbia River Treaty Negotiating Position To Include ‘Ecosystem-Based Function,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/434234.aspx

 

CBB, April 17, 2015, “NW Congressional Delegation Urges Obama To Initiate Negotiations On Columbia River Treaty,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/433725.aspx

 

For background on the Columbia River Treaty see:

 

-- CBB, Sept. 19, 2014, “Columbia River Treaty Reaches Age 50 This Week; British Columbia, U.S. Considering Future Options” http://www.cbbulletin.com/432128.aspx

 

-- CBB, March 21, 2014, “British Columbia Announces Decision To Continue Columbia River Treaty While Seeking ‘Improvements,’” http://www.cbbulletin.com/430094.aspx

 

-- CBB, Feb. 28, 2014 “15 Basin Tribes, Canadian First Nations Issue Report On Restoring Upper Columbia Salmon Passage,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/429847.aspx

 

-- CBB, Dec. 20, 2013, “Final Recommendations For Revising Columbia River Treaty With Canada Sent To State Department,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/429315.aspx

 

-- CBB, Nov. 27, 2013, “Columbia River Treaty Prompts Discussion Of Restoring Salmon Passage To Canadian Headwaters” http://www.cbbulletin.com/429144.aspx

 

-- CBB, Nov. 1, 2013, “Columbia River Treaty Negotiations Will Impact Libby Dam Operations, Reservoir Drafting/Refill,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/428897.aspx

 

-- CBB, Oct. 18, 2013, “B.C. Releases Draft Columbia River Treaty Recommendations, Wants Full Accounting Of U.S. Benefits,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/428719.aspx

 

-- CBB, Sept. 27, 2013, “U.S. Releases Draft Recommendations For ‘Modernizing’ Columbia River Treaty” http://www.cbbulletin.com/428444.aspx

 

-- CBB, Aug. 16, 2013, “Environmentalists Say Columbia River Treaty Needs To Expand To Include ‘Ecosystem-Based Functions,”’ http://www.cbbulletin.com/427918.aspx

 

-- CBB, Aug. 9, 2013, “Utilities Group Expresses Concern With Columbia River Treaty Draft Recommendations, Process, Scope,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/427854.aspx

 

Bookmark and Share

 

The Columbia Basin Bulletin, Bend, Oregon. For information or comments call 541-312-8860.
Bend Oregon Website Design by Bend Oregon Website Design by Smart SolutionsProduced by Intermountain Communications  |  Site Map